Why the study?
Does breed and body weight affect echocardiographic reference ranges in normal dogs?
Does breed and body weight affect echocardiographic reference ranges in normal dogs?
Echocardiographic measurements vary significantly among dog breeds even after accounting for body weight, indicating that breed-specific reference ranges are necessary.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant breed-specific echocardiographic ranges in dogs; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before practice change.
Eighty normal dogs of four morphologically disparate breeds (Pembroke Welsh Corgi, Miniature Poodle, Afghan Hound, Golden Retriever) (twenty of each breed), were studied by echocardiography to determine the importance of breed and weight in establishing normal echocardiographic reference ranges. Echocardiographic measurements included left-ventricular chamber dimension at systole and end-diastole, right-ventricular chamber dimension at end-diastole, interventricular septal thickness at systole and end-diastole, left-ventricular free wall thickness at systole and end-diastole, E-point septal separation, aortic root dimension at end-diastole, left atrial dimension, and fractional shortening. Analyses of covariance indicated that for all measurements except right-ventricular chamber dimension, the means were significantly different among breeds, after the differences in weight were taken into account. Echocardiographic measurements are variable even within the same breed. Breed must be considered in establishing echocardiographic measurement reference ranges. Echocardiographic values for each breed are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: