Key result
Using current gender or hormone therapy in the Pooled Cohort Equation reduced statin recommendations for transgender women to 18% and 22%, respectively, compared to 31% using sex assigned at birth.
Why the study?
Transgender individuals face disproportionate cardiovascular disease mortality, yet widely used cardiovascular risk estimators have not been validated in this population.
Does the method of operationalizing sex in the Pooled Cohort Equation affect cardiovascular risk estimation and statin recommendations in transgender women?
Cross-Sectional (n=102)
Does the method of operationalizing sex in the Pooled Cohort Equation affect cardiovascular risk estimation and statin recommendations in transgender women?
Average Pooled Cohort Equation risk scores and statin recommendations vary substantially depending on how sex is operationalized, suggesting current estimators may be unreliable in transgender populations.
Substantial variation in statin eligibility by PCE sex operationalization warrants caution in transgender women; leaves open optimal risk estimation approach.
Introduction: Approximately 2% of the U.S. population identifies as transgender, and transgender people experience disproportionate rates of cardiovascular disease mortality. However, widely used cardiovascular disease risk estimators have not been validated in this population. This study sought to determine the impact on statin therapy recommendations using 3 different approaches to operationalizing sex in the American Health Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equation Risk Estimator. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline clinical data from LITE Plus, a prospective cohort study of Black and/or Latina transgender women with HIV. Data were collected from October 2020 to June 2022 and used to calculate Pooled Cohort Equation scores. Results: The 102 participants had a mean age of 43 years. A total of 88% were Black, and 18% were Latina. A total of 79% were taking gender-affirming hormones. The average Pooled Cohort Equation risk score was 6% when sex assigned at birth was used and statins would be recommended for the 31% with Pooled Cohort Equation >7.5%. The average risk score was 4%, and 18% met the criteria for statin initiation when current gender was used; the mean risk score was 5%, and 22% met the criteria for statin initiation when current hormone therapy was used. Conclusions: Average Pooled Cohort Equation risk scores vary substantially depending on the approach to operationalizing the sex variable, suggesting that widely used cardiovascular risk estimators may be unreliable predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in transgender populations. Collection of sex, gender, and hormone use in longitudinal studies of cardiovascular health is needed to address this important limitation of current risk estimators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poteat et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in HIV (n=102). Operationalizing sex using current gender or hormone therapy vs. Operationalizing sex using sex assigned at birth was evaluated on Statin therapy recommendation (Pooled Cohort Equation >7.5%). Using current gender or hormone therapy in the Pooled Cohort Equation reduced statin recommendations for transgender women to 18% and 22%, respectively, compared to 31% using sex assigned at birth.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: