Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work presents seven M(II) metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) with three types of topology, which are hydrothermally synthesized by using a mixed ligand system including a functional group substituted phthalate (CF3-H2bdc or F4-H2bdc) and a dipyridyl-typed molecule (bpy, bpp, bpa, and bpe) (CF3-H2bdc = 4-(trifluoromethyl)phthalic acid, F4-H2bdc = tetrafluorophthalic acid, bpy = 4,4′-dipyridyl, bpp = 1,3-di(4-pyridyl)propane, bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane, and bpe = 1,2-di(4-pyridyl)ethylene). All these complexes display 3D MOFs featuring various metal(II)-carboxylate chains cross-linked further by dipyridyl-typed coligands. 1/1a serial possesses Cd(II)-carboxylate 21 helices forming the uninodal 5-connected nets with sev-5-Cccm topology, 2/2a serial contains Co(II)-carboxylate spiral-like chains assembling into the uninodal 5-connected nets with 5/4/t47 topology, and 3/3a/3b serial consists of Cu(II)-carboxylate 21 helices affording the uninodal 4-connected nets with a new framework topology (designated as lyu-3 here). Note that 1 undergoes a slight framework contraction in a single crystal to a single crystal form upon dehydration, whereas the framework expansion occurs in a single crystal to powder form upon rehydration. Interestingly, such reversible dehydrated–rehydrated behaviour is accompanied evidently by a rarely observed fluorescent transformation between 500 nm and 425 nm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: