Once again, Professor Gummesson’s incisive critique cuts through surface gloss to the heart and soul of the marketing academy. It is purpose, and not only technique that matters. Professor Gummesson raises issues about the mass production of scholarship that remain largely unspoken, even if they are recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Fuat Fırat (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: