Key result
Recreational long-distance runners demonstrated lower cardiac power output at maximal exercise compared to untrained controls (5.01 vs 5.64 W, p=0.03), despite superior aerobic capacity.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess cardiac performance in response to maximal physiological stress in recreational long-distance runners.
Does recreational long-distance running alter cardiac performance and oxygen extraction during maximal exercise compared to untrained controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=85)
Does recreational long-distance running alter cardiac performance and oxygen extraction during maximal exercise compared to untrained controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.01% vs 5.64%
p-value: p=0.03
Recreational endurance runners exhibit reduced cardiac workload and enhanced peripheral oxygen extraction during maximal exercise, suggesting a cardioprotective adaptation to training.
Runners may prioritize peripheral oxygen extraction over central hemodynamics during maximal effort; hypothesis-generating and should not yet alter clinical assessment.
BACKGROUND: This study assessed cardiac performance in response to maximal physiological stress in recreational long-distance runners. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, 44 male recreational long-distance runners (age 32.6±8.8 years; body mass index 23.4±2.2 kg/m²) and 41 age-matched and sex-matched untrained controls performed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer. Gas exchange and haemodynamic (bioreactance) measurements were assessed simultaneously. Cardiac power output (CPO), an integrative index of cardiac performance, was calculated from cardiac output and mean arterial pressure. Oxygen extraction was expressed as the arterial-venous oxygen difference (a-vO₂ diff). RESULTS: Runners achieved significantly higher maximal oxygen consumption than controls (53.2±6.8 vs 38.7±8.2 mL·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, p<0.01) and higher peak work rate (276±31 vs 231±60 W, p<0.01). Despite superior aerobic capacity, runners demonstrated lower indices of cardiac performance at maximal exercise, including CPO (5.01±1.00 vs 5.64±1.46 W, p=0.03), cardiac output (18.7±3.0 vs 22.6±4.4 L·min⁻¹, p<0.01) and stroke volume (109±21 vs 126±28 mL·beat⁻¹, p=0.04). In contrast, a-vO₂ diff was approximately 30% higher in runners (21.6±3.7 vs 15.9±4.5 mL O₂·100 mL⁻¹ blood, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Long-distance runners demonstrate higher oxygen consumption and oxygen extraction but lower haemodynamic response to maximal exercise stress test. These findings may suggest a potential cardioprotective role of endurance training characterised by reduced cardiac workload during maximal physiological stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kocić et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy males (recreational runners vs untrained controls) (n=85). Recreational long-distance running vs. Untrained controls was evaluated on Cardiac power output (CPO) at maximal exercise (p=0.03). Recreational long-distance runners demonstrated lower cardiac power output at maximal exercise compared to untrained controls (5.01 vs 5.64 W, p=0.03), despite superior aerobic capacity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: