Key result
Obesity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery was associated with prolonged operation time (p=0.03) and more superficial wound infections (p=0.03), with no difference in MACCE.
Why the study?
Robotic-assisted coronary surgery is gaining attraction as an alternative to open-heart procedures, but the impact of obesity on its outcomes required investigation.
Does obesity affect major outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery?
Cohort (n=210)
No
Does obesity affect major outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery?
Robotic-assisted coronary surgery is feasible and safe in obese patients, with major outcomes comparable to non-obese patients despite longer operation times and higher rates of superficial wound infections.
Comparable major outcomes support robotic coronary surgery in obese patients; leaves open prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted coronary surgery is gaining attraction as an alternative to traditional open-heart procedures, offering potential benefits such as decreased mortality rates, shorter hospital stays, and reduced complications. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of robotic-assisted coronary surgery, focusing particularly on the impact of obesity. METHODS: A total of 210 consecutive patients underwent robotic-assisted coronary surgery over an eight-year period at a single institution. Patients were categorized based on body mass index (BMI), distinguishing between obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) groups. The analysis encompassed preoperative characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Comparisons between obese and non-obese patients revealed similar preoperative comorbidities. However, the operation time was prolonged in the obese group (p = 0.03). Major cardiac and cerebrovascular events, along with overall complications, displayed no significant disparities between the groups. Notably, superficial wound infections were more prevalent among obese patients (p = 0.03). Importantly, intensive care unit and hospital stay times were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted coronary surgery demonstrates its potential as a viable alternative to conventional open-heart procedures, offering benefits such as reduced mortality rates, shorter hospital stays, and minimized perioperative complications. This study's findings underscore the feasibility and safety of this approach, with outcomes comparable between obese and non-obese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaşar et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring surgery (n=210). Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) vs. Non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) was evaluated on Major cardiac and cerebrovascular events and overall complications. Obesity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary surgery was associated with prolonged operation time (p=0.03) and more superficial wound infections (p=0.03), with no difference in MACCE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: