Key result
Local impedance measurement during catheter ablation yielded a mean impedance drop of 13.1 Ω compared to 6.1 Ω for generator impedance, serving as a better predictor of impedance drops.
Why the study?
A novel measure of local impedance was found to predict lesion formation during RFC catheter ablation, prompting investigation of its utility compared with generator impedance.
Does local impedance measurement better predict impedance drops during radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to generator impedance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=25)
Does local impedance measurement better predict impedance drops during radiofrequency catheter ablation compared to generator impedance in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Local impedance measurement during catheter ablation provides a better predictor of impedance drops than traditional generator impedance, potentially offering better insights into lesion formation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support local impedance over generator impedance for guiding AF ablation lesions; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in randomized studies.
AIMS: A novel measure of local impedance (LI) has been found to predict lesion formation during radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of this novel approach, while comparing LI to the well-established generator impedance (GI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 consecutive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation was guided by a 3D-mapping system measuring LI in addition to GI via an ablation catheter tip with three incorporated mini-electrodes. Local impedance and GI before and during RFC applications were studied. In total, 381 RFC applications were analysed. The baseline LI was higher in high-voltage areas (>0.5 mV; LI: 110.5 ± 13.7 Ω) when compared with intermediate-voltage sites (0.1-0.5 mV; 90.9 ± 10.1 Ω, P < 0.001), low-voltage areas (<0.1 mV; 91.9 ± 16.4 Ω, P < 0.001), and blood pool LI (91.9 ± 9.9 Ω, P < 0.001). During ablation, mean LI drop (△LI; 13.1 ± 9.1 Ω) was 2.15 times higher as mean GI drop (△GI) (6.1 ± 4.2 Ω, P < 0.001). Baseline LI correlated with △LI: a mean LI of 99.9 Ω predicted a △LI of 12.9 Ω [95% confidence interval (12.1-13.6), R2 0.41; P < 0.001]. This relationship was weak for baseline GI predicting △GI (R2 0.06, P < 0.001). Catheter movements were represented by rapid LI changes. The duration of an RFC application was not predictive for catheter-tissue coupling with no further change of △LI (P = 0.247) nor △GI (P = 0.376) during prolonged ablation. CONCLUSION: Local impedance can be monitored during ablation. Compared with the sole use of GI, baseline LI is a better predictor of impedance drops during ablation and may provide useful insights regarding lesion formation. However, further studies are needed to investigate if this novel approach is useful to guide catheter ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunawardene et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=25). Local impedance (LI) measurement vs. Generator impedance (GI) measurement was evaluated on Mean impedance drop during ablation (p=<0.001). Local impedance measurement during catheter ablation yielded a mean impedance drop of 13.1 Ω compared to 6.1 Ω for generator impedance, serving as a better predictor of impedance drops.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: