Key result
Combined contact force and baseline local impedance predicted a maximum local impedance drop >20 Ω with an AUC of 0.75, outperforming either parameter alone during repeat ablation.
Why the study?
Optimal lesion formation during RFC ablation depends on electro-mechanical tip-tissue coupling, but CF and LI dynamics required investigation in patients undergoing repeat ablation who frequently present with heterogenous arrhythmia substrate.
Does combined contact force and local impedance monitoring predict successful lesion formation (∆LI > 20 Ω) in patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia ablation?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does combined contact force and local impedance monitoring predict successful lesion formation (∆LI > 20 Ω) in patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia ablation?
Combining contact force and local impedance monitoring during repeat atrial fibrillation ablation improves the prediction of effective lesion formation, particularly in regions of low voltage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for combined contact force-impedance guidance in repeat ablation; prospective validation needed before practice change.
Background: Optimal lesion formation during catheter-based radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation depends on electro-mechanical tip-tissue coupling measurable via contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) monitoring. We aimed to investigate CF and LI dynamics in patients with previous atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation who frequently present with heterogenous arrhythmia substrate. Methods: Data from consecutive patients presenting for repeat AF or atrial tachycardia ablation using a novel open-irrigated single-tip ablation catheter were studied. RFC applications were investigated regarding CF, LI and the maximum LI drop (∆LI) for evaluation of ablation efficacy. ∆LI > 20 Ω was defined as a successful RFC application. Results: A total of 730 RFC applications in 20 patients were analyzed. Baseline CF was not associated with baseline LI (R = 0.06, p = 0.17). A mean CF < 8 g during ablation resulted in lower ∆LI (<8 g: 13 Ω vs. ≥ 8 g: 16 Ω, p < 0.001). Baseline LI showed a better correlation with ∆LI (R = 0.35, p < 0.001) compared to mean CF (R = 0.17, p < 0.001). Mean CF correlated better with ∆LI in regions of low (R = 0.31, p < 0.001) compared to high (R = 0.21, p = 0.02) and intermediate voltage (R = 0.17, p = 0.004). Combined CF and baseline LI predicted ∆LI > 20 Ω (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.75) better compared to baseline LI (AUC 0.72), mean CF (AUC 0.60), force-time integral (AUC 0.59) and local bipolar voltage (0.55). Conclusion: Combination of CF and LI may aid monitoring real-time catheter-tissue electro-mechanical coupling and lesion formation within heterogenous atrial arrhythmia substrate in patients with repeat AF or atrial tachycardia ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alken et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Repeat atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia (n=20). Combined contact force and baseline local impedance vs. Baseline local impedance or mean contact force alone was evaluated on Prediction of maximum local impedance drop > 20 Ω (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79, p=<0.001). Combined contact force and baseline local impedance predicted a maximum local impedance drop >20 Ω with an AUC of 0.75, outperforming either parameter alone during repeat ablation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: