Key result
Real-time contact force assessment during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with shorter procedure times, reduced fluoroscopy exposure, and a higher proportion of durable lesions.
Why the study?
Does real-time catheter-tissue contact force assessment improve procedural and clinical outcomes in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Does real-time catheter-tissue contact force assessment improve procedural and clinical outcomes in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?
Real-time contact force assessment during AF ablation improves procedural efficiency and may enhance lesion durability and clinical efficacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance AF ablation efficiency; hypothesis-generating for lesion durability and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
The efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited. Increase of success would require more durable lesions without increased risk of complications, such as of steam pop and cardiac perforation. Recently, novel technologies have been developed to estimate real-time catheter-tissue contact force (CF). This paper reviews three available tools for assessment of CF and data on experimental or clinical experience. Experimental data with open-irrigated catheter showed that lesion size was greater with applications of lower power (like 30 W) and greater CF (e.g. 30 to 40 g) than vice versa with high power and low CF. Impedance drop in the first 5 seconds was significantly correlated to catheter CF. Perforation was achieved more rapidly with the ablation catheter in a sheath despite the same CF because the sheath prevents catheter buckling. Clinical experience confirmed poor relationship between CF and either unipolar amplitude, bipolar amplitude, or impedance. Within the left atrium, the most common high CF site was found at the anterior/rightward LA roof, directly beneath the ascending aorta (confirmed by merging the CT image and map). Importantly, several studies showed that the use of CF leads to shorter procedure with less fluoroscopy time and less RF applications. CF assessment was also found to be associated with higher proportion of durable lesions. Finally, pilot studies showed that CF measurement could be associated with better clinical efficacy AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kautzner et al. (2014) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. Contact force assessment during catheter ablation vs. Standard ablation without contact force assessment was evaluated. Real-time contact force assessment during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with shorter procedure times, reduced fluoroscopy exposure, and a higher proportion of durable lesions.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: