Key result
The use of an endocardial contact force catheter during hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation significantly reduced procedure duration compared to a standard catheter (223 vs 256 minutes).
Why the study?
Does the use of a contact force sensing catheter reduce procedure duration and predict arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=68)
No
Does the use of a contact force sensing catheter reduce procedure duration and predict arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation?
The use of contact force sensing catheters during hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation is safe, significantly reduces procedure time, and demonstrates that low contact force (<10 g) is associated with arrhythmia recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May shorten hybrid AF ablation; leaves open whether contact force improves outcomes or warrants routine use.
OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the ablation tip and cardiac tissue may increase the risk of thrombus formation, catheter tip charring, steam pop formation, and even cardiac perforation. CF monitoring is a significant new parameter for titration of the CF for creating an adequate lesion. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent epicardial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices. After checking electrical bidirectional block of the ablation lines, an endocardial CF catheter was used for further ablation (if needed) to complete the isolation of PVs, box lesion, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). RESULTS: Endocardial touch-up was needed for 2 PVs (1.3 %) and 10 (26.3 %) box lesions. It was also used for the CTI line in 7 (18.4 %) patients, atrial tachycardia in 3 (7.9 %) patients, and additional CFAE ablation in 17 (44.7 %) patients. All 5 patients with arrhythmia recurrence had a mean CF < 10 g (p = 0.03). Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the CF group (223 ± 57 vs. 256 ± 60 min, p = 0.03) compared with control group. CONCLUSION: Use of CF catheters is safe, feasible, and complementary to a hybrid procedure setup for atrial fibrillation ablation. Its real-time monitoring may predict future arrhythmia recurrence, and decrease procedure time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=68). Endocardial contact force (CF) catheter during hybrid ablation vs. Standard non-force sensing irrigated tip catheter was evaluated on Procedure duration (minutes) (p=0.03). The use of an endocardial contact force catheter during hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation significantly reduced procedure duration compared to a standard catheter (223 vs 256 minutes).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: