Key result
Ketamine-dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly longer recovery time (MD 7.59 min) and lower pain scores (MD -0.72) compared to ketamine-propofol for periprocedural sedation.
Why the study?
Ketamine combined with propofol or dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation, but evidence comparing the efficiency and efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients was needed.
Does a ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to a ketamine-propofol combination for periprocedural sedation in adult and pediatric patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,429)
Does a ketamine-dexmedetomidine combination improve efficacy and safety outcomes compared to a ketamine-propofol combination for periprocedural sedation in adult and pediatric patients?
Ketamine-dexmedetomidine provides superior pain control and respiratory safety but is associated with longer recovery times and more postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to ketamine-propofol for periprocedural sedation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ketamine-dexmedetomidine for improved analgesia and respiratory safety despite delayed recovery; extends comparative sedation evidence for periprocedural use.
Purpose of Review The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we helped the anesthesiologists to know the efficiency and the efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients. Methods We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 1, 2023. Our outcome parameters for efficacy were recovery time, pain score, and physician satisfaction while for safety were the related cardiorespiratory, neurological, and gastrointestinal adverse events. Recent Findings Twenty-two trials were included with a total of 1429 patients. We found a significantly longer recovery time in the ketadex group of 7.59 min (95% CI, 4.92, 10.26; I 2 = 94%) and a significantly less pain score of − 0.72 (95% CI, − 1.10, − 0.34; I 2 = 0%). Adults had a significantly better physician satisfaction score with the ketofol group, odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12, 0.71; I 2 = 0%). Recovery agitations were higher in the ketofol group with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.98; I 2 = 36%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference between the combinations with a higher incidence in the ketadex group with pooled odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06, 2.88; I 2 = 15%). Summary Ketadex was associated with lower pain scores, hypoxic events and airway obstruction, and emergence agitation. At the same time, ketofol had much more clinician satisfaction which might be attributed to the shorter recovery time and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, we suppose that ketadex is the better combination in periprocedural sedation for both adult and pediatric patients who are not at greater risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsaeidy et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Periprocedural sedation (n=1,429). Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine (ketadex) vs. Ketamine-Propofol (ketofol) was evaluated on Recovery time (MD 7.59, 95% CI 4.92, 10.26). Ketamine-dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly longer recovery time (MD 7.59 min) and lower pain scores (MD -0.72) compared to ketamine-propofol for periprocedural sedation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: