Key result
Pre-PCI Post Systolic Shortening Index significantly predicted left ventricular remodeling (AUC 0.74) and LVEF improvement (AUC 0.75) in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI.
Why the study?
STEMI can lead to significant changes in LV structure and LV remodeling, prompting investigation into whether STE and PSSI can predict LV remodeling, LVEF improvement, and viable myocardium.
Does pre-PCI Post Systolic Shortening Index (PSSI) predict left ventricular remodeling and LVEF improvement in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI?
Cohort (n=47)
Single-blind
No
Does pre-PCI Post Systolic Shortening Index (PSSI) predict left ventricular remodeling and LVEF improvement in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.74 (95% CI 0.6-0.91)
p-value: p=0.005
In STEMI patients undergoing late PCI, pre-procedural Post Systolic Shortening Index (PSSI) measured by speckle tracking echocardiography can predict left ventricular remodeling and LVEF improvement at 6 weeks.
May support PSSI for risk stratification in late STEMI PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can lead to significant changes in left ventricular (LV) structure, ultimately resulting in left ventricular remodeling (LVr). Objectives: The present study aims to investigate the capability of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and Post Systolic Shortening Index (PSSI) to predict LVr, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and the detection of viable myocardium in STEMI patients. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 47 patients with STEMI and Q-ST elevation in V1 - V4 precordial leads on electrocardiogram (ECG), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after 24 hours (late PCI). Echocardiography was performed before PCI and 6 weeks post-PCI. Results: Left ventricular remodeling and improvement in LVEF were observed in 15 (31.9%) and 23 (48.9%) patients, respectively, after PCI. The average pre-PCI PSSI in patients with LVr was significantly lower (P = 0.005) than in those without remodeling. Conversely, the average pre-PCI PSSI in patients with improved LVEF was significantly higher (P = 0.004) than in those without improvement. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that pre-PCI PSSI can predict LVr (AUC = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.6 - 0.91; P = 0.005) and LVEF improvement (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.6 - 0.89; P = 0.004) post-PCI. Cut points of 19 and 20 for pre-PCI PSSI had the highest accuracy for predicting LVr and LVEF improvement post-PCI (74.47% and 72.34%, respectively). Conclusions: The study demonstrates that in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI, STE indicators, including PSSI, are predictive of LVr, LVEF improvement, and can identify viable myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalalian et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=47). Pre-PCI Post Systolic Shortening Index (PSSI) was evaluated on Prediction of left ventricular remodeling (LVr) post-PCI (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.6-0.91, p=0.005). Pre-PCI Post Systolic Shortening Index significantly predicted left ventricular remodeling (AUC 0.74) and LVEF improvement (AUC 0.75) in STEMI patients undergoing late PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: