Key result
Pregnant women with white coat hypertension developed proteinuric pre-eclampsia significantly less often than those with confirmed essential hypertension (8% vs 22%, P=0.008).
Why the study?
Does white coat hypertension compared to confirmed essential hypertension alter the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in pregnant women?
Observational (n=241)
No
Does white coat hypertension compared to confirmed essential hypertension alter the risk of developing pre-eclampsia in pregnant women?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 22%
p-value: p=0.008
Pregnant women with white coat hypertension have a significantly lower risk of developing pre-eclampsia compared to those with true essential hypertension, suggesting antihypertensives can be initially withheld.
White coat hypertension was associated with lower pre-eclampsia risk than essential hypertension; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: White coat hypertension (WCH) is a common phenomenon with a long term prognosis intermediate between those with true hypertension and true normotension. The natural history of this phenomenon throughout pregnancy remains unknown. We assessed the likelihood of women with an initial diagnosis of WCH developing pre-eclampsia (PE) as their pregnancy progressed. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: St George Hospital, a teaching and University hospital. POPULATION: Two hundred and forty-one pregnant women with an early pregnancy diagnosis of essential hypertension (EH). METHODS: Eighty-six women had this diagnosis (EH) confirmed pre-pregnancy by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) or repeated automated home blood pressure (BP) self-measurement. The remaining 155 underwent 24-hour ABPM in early pregnancy to establish their diagnosis. Women found to have WCH did not receive antihypertensives during their pregnancy, whereas those with confirmed EH received oxprenolol or methyldopa. Women with WCH had repeated 24-hour ABPM and/or BP assessments in a pregnancy day assessment unit until delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The development of PE in women with WCH or EH. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of WCH was 32%. Half retained this phenomenon throughout pregnancy and had good pregnancy outcomes. Forty percent developed (benign) gestational hypertension and also had good pregnancy outcomes while 8% developed proteinuric PE, significantly fewer than in women with confirmed EH (22%), P= 0.008. No BP parameter at study entry permitted discrimination between those women with WCH who retained this phenomenon and those who developed GH or PE. CONCLUSION: WCH is a common phenomenon in pregnant women who appear to have EH according to routine BP measurement early in pregnancy. Antihypertensives may be withheld from this group initially and they can be advised they will have better pregnancy outcomes than women with true EH. However, continued monitoring throughout pregnancy remains important to detect the small group of white coat hypertensives who develop PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Essential hypertension in early pregnancy (n=241). White coat hypertension vs. Confirmed essential hypertension was evaluated on Development of pre-eclampsia (p=0.008). Pregnant women with white coat hypertension developed proteinuric pre-eclampsia significantly less often than those with confirmed essential hypertension (8% vs 22%, P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: