Key result
Compared with men under 65, older patients and women with ACS had significantly lower odds of receiving evidence-based therapies, with women ≥85 having the lowest odds for aspirin (OR 0.46).
Why the study?
Are there age and sex differences in the utilization of evidence-based therapies for patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes?
Observational (n=50,096)
Yes
Are there age and sex differences in the utilization of evidence-based therapies for patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes?
Despite increasing trends in evidence-based therapy use over time, significant treatment gaps persist for elderly patients and women hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes.
Treatment gaps for older women with ACS warrant clinician vigilance; hypothesis-generating for targeted equity interventions.
BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have examined the age and sex differences, and potentially changing trends, in cardiac medication and procedure use in patients hospitalized with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: Using data from a large multinational study, we examined the age and sex differences, and changing trends (1999-2007) therein, in the hospital use of evidence-based therapies in patients hospitalized with an ACS using data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (n=50 096). RESULTS: After adjustment for several variables, in comparison with men below 65 years, patients in other age-sex strata had a significantly lower odds of receiving aspirin [odds ratios (ORs) for men 65-74, 75-84, and >or=85 years, women <65, 65-74, 75-84, and >or=85 years were 0.86, 0.84, 0.72, 0.80, 0.86, 0.68 and 0.46, respectively], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ORs, 1.08, 1.01, 0,71, 0.83, 0.90, 0.89, and 0.63), beta blockers (ORs, 0.66, 0.52, 0.53, 0.67, 0.54, 0.53, and 0.52), statins (ORs, 0.72, 0.49, 0.29, 0.82, 0.68, 0.44, and 0.22), and undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a percutaneous coronary intervention (ORs, 0.79, 0.53, 0.21, 0.64, 0.57, 0.38, and 0.13) during their acute hospitalization. Age and sex differences in the receipt of these therapies remained relatively unchanged during the period under study. CONCLUSION: Although there were increasing trends in the use of evidence-based medications and cardiac procedures over time, important gaps in the utilization of effective cardiac treatment modalities persist in elderly patients and younger women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=50,096). Older age and female sex vs. Men below 65 years was evaluated on Receipt of evidence-based therapies (aspirin, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta blockers, statins, CABG, or PCI) during acute hospitalization. Compared with men under 65, older patients and women with ACS had significantly lower odds of receiving evidence-based therapies, with women ≥85 having the lowest odds for aspirin (OR 0.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: