Key result
Dabigatran was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with intracranial bleeding (20% vs 22%; RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.62-1.37).
Why the study?
Does dabigatran increase in-hospital mortality compared to warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients who develop intracranial bleeding?
Population
2,391 atrial fibrillation patients admitted to a hospital with a primary diagnosis of intracranial bleeding…
Comparison
Dabigatran vs Warfarin
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
in-hospital
Authors
Loading...
May alleviate reversal concerns for dabigatran in AF-related intracranial bleeding; observational data leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
Cohort (n=2,391)
Does dabigatran increase in-hospital mortality compared to warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients who develop intracranial bleeding?
Relative Risk: 0.93 (95% CI 0.62–1.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 22%
In real-world atrial fibrillation patients who develop intracranial bleeding, prior use of dabigatran is not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared to warfarin, alleviating concerns regarding the lack of a reversal agent.
Alonso et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with intracranial bleeding (n=2,391). Dabigatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.62-1.37). Dabigatran was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients with intracranial bleeding (20% vs 22%; RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.62-1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: