Key result
Admission to a ranked hospital for acute myocardial infarction was associated with a lower risk-standardized 30-day mortality rate compared to nonranked hospitals (16.0% vs 17.9%, P<.001).
Why the study?
Does admission to a top-ranked hospital compared to a nonranked hospital reduce 30-day mortality in Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Population
268,569 Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in 2003
Comparison
Admission to a hospital ranked in 'America's… vs Admission to a nonranked hospital
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
30 days
Authors
Loading...
Association with lower AMI mortality supports targeted investigation of ranked centers; should not yet guide individual referrals given observational design and performance overlap.
Observational (n=268,569)
Yes
Does admission to a top-ranked hospital compared to a nonranked hospital reduce 30-day mortality in Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 17.9%
p-value: p=<.001
Admission to a top-ranked hospital for acute myocardial infarction is associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate on average, although there is significant overlap in performance with nonranked hospitals.
Wang et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=268,569). Admission to a ranked hospital vs. Admission to a nonranked hospital was evaluated on Risk-standardized 30-day mortality rate (RSMR) (p=<.001). Admission to a ranked hospital for acute myocardial infarction was associated with a lower risk-standardized 30-day mortality rate compared to nonranked hospitals (16.0% vs 17.9%, P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: