Individual patient data meta-analysis demonstrates strong correlation between disease-free and overall survival in esophageal cancer, indicating disease-free survival is a valid surrogate endpoint.
BACKGROUND: The use of surrogate endpoints may expedite the reporting of study outcomes of clinical trials. The validity of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal (E) or gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinomas remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate DFS as a surrogate end-point for OS in E/GEJ using the meta-analytical approach DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: individual patient data from an international meta-analysis on operable locally advanced E/GEJ, which including randomized trials comparing at least two of the neo-adjuvant treatment strategies: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and/or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Individual (Kendall's tau) and trial-level (R2) correlations between DFS and OS were estimated using a Clayton copula. RESULTS: DFS and OS data were available for a total of 4518 pts: 2222 pts included in CS vs S, 1908 pts in CRS vs S, and 388 in CS vs CRS comparisons. 3440 patients had a DFS event and 3303 patients died. Kendall's tau was 0.73 [95 % CI 0.71 - 0.75] and R2 trial-level correlation was 0.95 [0.84 - 0.99] for CS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.76 [0.74 - 0.77] and R2 was 0.96 [0.87 - 0.99] for CRS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.87 [0.78 - 0.92] and R2 was 0.93 [0.43 - 1] for CRS vs CS. In a multistate model, the median time in the recurrence state was shorter in older vs more recent trials: mean time of 10.8 [10.2 - 11.4] vs 16.5 months [15.4-17.6]. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: DFS is a validated surrogate endpoint for OS in trials evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in E/GEJ. DFS may be more useful as an endpoint when delays between recurrences and death become larger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabrit et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: