Key result
Remote-controlled magnetic mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia was successful in 92.3% of patients, with no complications and rare mechanically induced extrasystoles.
Why the study?
Does remote-controlled magnetic mapping and ablation achieve successful ablation in patients with right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia?
Population
13 consecutive patients with right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia or ventricular…
Design
Case_series
Follow-up
mean 252 ± 211 days
Authors
Loading...
Supports feasibility in experienced centers; leaves open need for randomized trials versus manual ablation.
Observational (n=13)
Does remote-controlled magnetic mapping and ablation achieve successful ablation in patients with right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia?
Remote-controlled magnetic mapping and ablation of RVOT tachycardia is feasible, safe, and effective, with a high success rate and low incidence of mechanically induced extrasystoles.
Konstantinidou et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia and ventricular extrasystoles (n=13). Remote-controlled magnetic (RCM) mapping and ablation was evaluated on Successful RCM VT/VES ablation. Remote-controlled magnetic mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia was successful in 92.3% of patients, with no complications and rare mechanically induced extrasystoles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: