Key result
Novel anticoagulants offer effective thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation with reduced rates of intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine monitoring compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Why the study?
Do novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) offer advantages over vitamin K antagonists for thromboembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Do novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) offer advantages over vitamin K antagonists for thromboembolic prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Novel anticoagulants provide an effective and more convenient alternative to vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, with a notable reduction in intracranial hemorrhage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adoption of novel anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation; confirms advantages but leaves open optimal agent selection and long-term data in diverse groups.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications and stroke. Therefore, the implementation of thromboembolic preventive treatment is the cornerstone of quality management in AF patients. During the last 60 years, vitamin K antagonists remain at the forefront of antithrombotic management of AF patients. Randomized trials have demonstrated their superiority over aspirin as well as over the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel with similar safety profile. However, the disseminated use of vitamin K antagonists among suitable candidates is hampered by their inherent limitations. As a result, a considerable proportion of AF patients do not receive this life-saving therapy. In the last few years, novel anticoagulants targeting factors IIa (dabigatran) and Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) in the coagulation cascade have been developed. Recently completed phase III mega-trials of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban have provided cumulative evidence in favor of these novel anticoagulants. Their main advantages, apart from their treatment efficacy, include the reduced rate of intracranial hemorrhage, the lack of need for routine coagulation monitoring, the predictable anticoagulation response and the limited interaction with food and drugs. In the present manuscript we present a critical appraisal of the recent trials focusing on issues that are expected to influence decision making on selection of novel anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzeis et al. (2011) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Novel anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated. Novel anticoagulants offer effective thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation with reduced rates of intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine monitoring compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: