Key result
Systemic thrombolysis should be reserved for high-risk pulmonary embolism with hypotension and shock in pregnant patients due to significant bleeding risks, while heparin can be used safely.
Why the study?
Pulmonary embolism is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnancy and the puerperium, causing haemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest due to obstructive shock in severe cases.
Diagnostic imaging for PE should not be delayed in pregnancy, and while LMWH/UFH are safe, systemic thrombolysis carries significant bleeding risks and should be reserved for high-risk PE with shock.
Timely PE imaging and LMWH/UFH remain appropriate in pregnancy; leaves open optimal thrombolysis thresholds without randomized data.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pregnancy and the puerperium. In severe cases, it causes haemodynamic instability and can lead to cardiac arrest due to obstructive shock. Patients with acute PE can be risk stratified to guide their monitoring and treatment; this article focuses on intermediate- and high-risk PE. The criteria for defining high-risk PE can be used unmodified in pregnancy. Diagnostic imaging should not be delayed due to pregnancy. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) can be used during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and systemic thrombolysis can be used in obstetric patients, but there are significant bleeding risks and it should be reserved for high-risk PE with hypotension and shock. Although pregnancy and the puerperium are risk factors for PE, it is important to avoid early diagnostic closure, and to consider other causes for the patient's presentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhaskar Narayan (2024) conducted a review in Severe acute pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Systemic thrombolysis should be reserved for high-risk pulmonary embolism with hypotension and shock in pregnant patients due to significant bleeding risks, while heparin can be used safely.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: