Key result
A personalized eight-week mHealth telerehabilitation program is being evaluated for efficacy, feasibility, and adherence in 30 low-risk cardiac patients, with no results reported in this protocol.
Why the study?
Despite offering similar benefits to hospital and home care, implementation of cardio-telerehabilitation programs in public and private healthcare environments remains scarce and limited.
Does a personalized eight-week mHealth telerehabilitation program improve efficacy, feasibility, and adherence in low-risk CVD patients with NYHA class I heart failure?
Does a personalized eight-week mHealth telerehabilitation program improve efficacy, feasibility, and adherence in low-risk CVD patients with NYHA class I heart failure?
This study protocol describes a prospective controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and adherence of an 8-week mHealth telerehabilitation program in low-risk cardiac patients.
Individual and group cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by reducing recurrent events, improving risk factors, aiding compliance with drug treatment, and improving quality of life through physical activity and education. Home-based programs are equally effective in improving exercise capacity, risk factors, mortality, and health-related quality of life outcomes compared to hospital-based intervention. Cardio-telerehabilitation (CTR) programs are a supplement or an alternative to hospital rehabilitation programs providing similar benefits to usual hospital and home care. Despite this statement, implementation in the public and private healthcare environment is still scarce and limited. The main objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and adherence of a personalized eight-week mHealth telerehabilitation program in low-risk cardiac patients in the hospital of Melilla (Spain). The secondary aims were to investigate patient satisfaction, identify barriers of implementation and adverse events, and assess cost-effectiveness from a health system perspective. A study protocol for a single center prospective controlled trial was conducted at the Regional Hospital of Melilla (Spain), with a sample size of (n = 30) patients with a diagnosis of low-risk CVD with class I heart failure according to NYHA (New York Heart Association). Outcomes of this study, will add new evidence that could support the use of CTR in cardiac patients clinical guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pastora‐Bernal et al. (2021) studied Low-risk cardiovascular disease with class I heart failure (n=30). mHealth telerehabilitation program was evaluated on Efficacy, feasibility, and adherence. A personalized eight-week mHealth telerehabilitation program is being evaluated for efficacy, feasibility, and adherence in 30 low-risk cardiac patients, with no results reported in this protocol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: