This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We explore processes that enable effective policies and practices for managing the links between water, energy, and food. Three case studies are assessed at different scales in the Mekong River basin, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe. We find that there are considerable opportunities for improving outcomes for sustainable development by finding solutions that accommodate multiple objectives in the nexus. These include making data more publicly available, commissioning independent experts to advise on contested issues, engaging under-represented stakeholders in decision-making, sharing benefits, exploring different perspectives in forums where alternative development options can be tested and engaging decision-makers at different scales.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pittock et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: