Key result
A history of prosthetic heart valve placement and the number of days of warfarin cessation significantly influenced the period required for the restoration of anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction.
Why the study?
What factors influence the period required for the restoration of anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral warfarin therapy?
Observational (n=60)
No
What factors influence the period required for the restoration of anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral warfarin therapy?
Effect estimate: partial regression coefficient 0.31
In patients on warfarin undergoing tooth extraction, a history of prosthetic heart valve and the number of days of warfarin cessation significantly prolong the time required for PT-INR to recover to pre-extraction levels.
May inform closer PT-INR monitoring after extraction in prosthetic valve patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
We statistically analyzed factors that influence anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral warfarin therapy. The study group comprised 60 of 109 patients who were receiving warfarin and presented at our hospitalfor tooth extraction from August 1991 through December 2001. The Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (PT INR) of these 60 patients was measured and followed up until 4 weeks after tooth extraction. Multiple linear regression based on AMOS was used for statistical analysis. The dependent variable was the period oftime required after tooth extraction for the PT INR (cardiologist-determined PT INR), a cardiologist-determined coagulation index for the purpose of cardiovascular therapy, to recover to its pre-extraction level. Our study revealed that anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction was influenced by a history of prosthetic heart valve placement (prosthetic valve), the dosage of warfarin administered (the dosage), the numbers of days of treatment cessation and of administering a reduced dose of warfarin, and the cardiologist-determined PT INR. The effects of prosthetic valve and the number of days of cessation of warfarin treatment were statistically significant (partial regression coefficient, 0.31). The influence of the number of days of treatment cessation was indirectly, affected by the prosthetic valve, the dosage, and the cardiologist-determined PT INR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukumoto et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Patients receiving oral warfarin therapy undergoing tooth extraction (n=60). Prosthetic heart valve placement and days of warfarin cessation was evaluated on Period of time required after tooth extraction for the PT INR to recover to its pre-extraction level (partial regression coefficient 0.31). A history of prosthetic heart valve placement and the number of days of warfarin cessation significantly influenced the period required for the restoration of anticoagulant effect after tooth extraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: