Key result
This protocol describes a 12-week cluster-randomized trial to evaluate whether HRV-guided training improves VO2max compared to traditional training in professional endurance athletes.
Why the study?
There is a dearth of studies involving professional endurance athletes following a defined HRV-guided training protocol.
Does HRV-guided training improve maximal oxygen uptake in professional endurance athletes compared to traditional training?
Population
Professional endurance athletes
Comparison
HRV-guided training vs traditional-based training
Design
Cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol
Follow-up
12 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Protocol for first RCT of HRV-guided training in professional endurance athletes; will clarify efficacy versus traditional methods in this population.
RCT
Cluster-randomized
Does HRV-guided training improve maximal oxygen uptake in professional endurance athletes compared to traditional training?
This protocol outlines a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate whether HRV-guided training improves functional performance (VO2max) more than traditional training in professional endurance athletes.
Poyatos et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Professional endurance athletes. HRV-guided training vs. Traditional-based training was evaluated on Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) attained in an incremental treadmill test. This protocol describes a 12-week cluster-randomized trial to evaluate whether HRV-guided training improves VO2max compared to traditional training in professional endurance athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: