Key result
Velocity vector imaging parameters, particularly fractional area change (R=0.7, P<0.001), significantly correlated with MRI-derived right ventricular ejection fraction in children with HLHS.
Why the study?
Does velocity vector imaging reliably reflect right ventricular systolic function compared to MRI in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome?
Observational (n=49)
Does velocity vector imaging reliably reflect right ventricular systolic function compared to MRI in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome?
Effect estimate: R = 0.7
p-value: p=<0.001
Velocity vector imaging, particularly fractional area change, provides a reliable and reproducible echocardiographic alternative to MRI for assessing right ventricular systolic function in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
May support echo-based RV monitoring in HLHS; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
AIMS: Velocity vector imaging (VVI) is an echocardiographic technique based on speckle tracking, which has been validated for the left ventricle (LV). It has not been validated to assess the systemic right ventricle (RV) in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether VVI measurements reliably reflect RV systolic function in patients with HLHS when compared with RV ejection fraction (EF) calculated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, 49 children with HLHS underwent transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac MRI under the same general anaesthetic as a part of routine assessment between the different stages of palliative surgery. Global RV fractional area change (FAC-VVI), strain (S), strain rate (SR), and peak systolic velocity (V) were analysed from the apical four-chamber view using the VVI technique. MRI-derived EF was calculated from a short-axis cine stack of images. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was excellent for all VVI parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.9). All VVI-derived parameters, except myocardial velocity, correlated with MRI-derived EF (FAC-VVI: R = 0.7, P < 0.001; S: R = -0.5, P < 0.001; SR: R = 0.5, P = 0.001, and V: R = 0.1, P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: All VVI-derived parameters, except V, correlate with MRI-derived EF, with FAC being the best predictor of it. Reproducibility of all VVI parameters is excellent. VVI provides a useful tool for the follow-up of RV function during the staged treatment protocol for HLHS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruotsalainen et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) (n=49). Velocity vector imaging (VVI) vs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Correlation of VVI-derived parameters with MRI-derived right ventricular ejection fraction (R = 0.7, p=<0.001). Velocity vector imaging parameters, particularly fractional area change (R=0.7, P<0.001), significantly correlated with MRI-derived right ventricular ejection fraction in children with HLHS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: