Key result
Machine learning techniques, specifically support vector regression, estimated calendar age from autonomic cardiovascular function with a mean absolute error of 5.49 years.
Why the study?
Aging is accompanied by changes in cardiovascular physiology that promote age-related diseases, warranting a modern machine learning approach to quantify these physiological effects using autonomic cardiovascular function indicators.
Observational (n=885)
Effect estimate: MAE 5.49 years
Machine learning techniques applied to resting ECG and continuous blood pressure can accurately estimate calendar age, quantifying the effects of healthy aging on cardiovascular function.
Aging is accompanied by changes in the cardiovascular physiology that promote the development of age-related diseases. This paper presents a modern approach to quantify the physiological effects of age on the cardiovascular system by applying modern machine learning techniques to several indicators of autonomic cardiovascular function. In 885 healthy subjects, 33 different indices were calculated on resting state electrocardiogram and continuous blood pressure recordings. Based on those parameters, five different approaches were applied in order to reconstruct the calendar age of healthy subjects, i.e., linear regression (LR), neural network (NN), Gaussian process regression (GPR), support vector regression (SVR), and relevance vector regression (RVR). Hyper parameters of machine learning methods were optimized via grid search. After 20 repetitions of a five-fold cross-validation, the mean absolute error (MAE) was computed between the calendar and estimated age to assess the accuracy of each method. The results show that the lowest error for age estimation was achieved using SVR with a MAE of 5.49 years. GPR performed comparably well to SVR with a MAE of 5.55 years, while NN led to a MAE of 5.72 years. RVR and LR revealed MAE of more than six years (6.21 and 6.34 years). The error of age estimation could be further reduced by applying outlier correction to the input data leading to a minimum MAE of 4.53 years with GPR. In conclusion, our results suggest that machine learning can be used to quantify the effects of healthy aging on cardio-vascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabeghi et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=885). Machine learning techniques (SVR, GPR, NN, RVR, LR) was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) between calendar and estimated age (MAE 5.49 years). Machine learning techniques, specifically support vector regression, estimated calendar age from autonomic cardiovascular function with a mean absolute error of 5.49 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: