Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiopulmonary bypass with systemic heparinization causes trauma to blood cells and coagulation defects. Artificial surfaces could be coated by end-linkage binding of heparin (Carmeda Bioactive Surface CBAS™). The use of such surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass in animals resulted in less postoperative blood loss and better preservation of blood cells. Heparin-coated circuits were employed during coronary artery grafting in seven patients (Group C). Concomitantly, the heparin dose was reduced by 25% and an ACT of 300 sec was accepted. An additional seven patients were operated with non-coated circuits (Group NC), requiring an ACT above 400 sec with normal doses of heparin. There was no thrombo-embolic complications in Group C. The postoperative bleeding was generally low and without significant intergroup differences. Coagulation parameters displayed a significantly lower ACT and anti-Factor Xa during bypass in Group 1C. A tendency towards less blood cell trauma was observed with heparin-coated circuits, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. The protamine dose could be reduced by 50%, which significantly reduced the protamine/heparin quotient. This study indicates that routine cardiopulmonary bypass could safely be performed with heparin-coated circuits and reduced intravenous doses of heparin and protamine. It is suggested that the use of heparin-coated circuits may lead to less blood cell trauma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borowiec et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: