Key result
Cardiac magnetic resonance provides a highly accurate reference standard for assessing mitral regurgitation and guiding clinical decision-making compared to conventional echocardiography.
Why the study?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance improve diagnostic performance and risk stratification compared to echocardiography in patients with mitral regurgitation prior to surgery?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance improve diagnostic performance and risk stratification compared to echocardiography in patients with mitral regurgitation prior to surgery?
CMR is a valuable tool for the comprehensive evaluation of mitral regurgitation, offering precise quantification and tissue characterization that can guide surgical decision-making.
May support CMR for mitral regurgitation quantification in ambiguous cases; leaves open prospective trials before changing practice.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common cause of morbidity worldwide and an accepted indication for interventional therapies which aim to reduce or resolve adverse clinical outcomes associated with MR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides highly accurate means of assessing MR, including a variety of approaches that can measure MR based on quantitative flow. Additionally, CMR is widely accepted as a reference standard for cardiac chamber quantification, enabling reliable detection of subtle changes in cardiac chamber size and function so as to guide decision-making regarding timing of mitral valve directed therapies. Beyond geometric imaging, CMR enables tissue characterization of ischemia and infarction in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium as well as within the mitral valve apparatus, thus enabling identification of structural substrates for MR. This review provides an overview of established and emerging CMR approaches to measure valvular regurgitation, including relative utility of different approaches for patients with primary or secondary MR. Clinical outcomes studies are discussed with focus on data demonstrating advantages of CMR for guiding diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with known or suspected MR. Comparative data is reviewed with focus on diagnostic performance of CMR in comparison to conventional assessment via echocardiography (echo). Emerging literature is reviewed concerning potential new approaches that utilize CMR tissue characterization to guide clinical decision-making in order to improve therapeutic outcomes and clinical prognosis for patients with MR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2017) conducted a review in Mitral regurgitation. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vs. Echocardiography (echo) was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides a highly accurate reference standard for assessing mitral regurgitation and guiding clinical decision-making compared to conventional echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: