Key result
A cardiac vagal tone cut-off of 3.2LVS identified established cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy with 67% sensitivity and 87% specificity (p=0.01).
Why the study?
The study tested the performance of cardiac vagal tone derived from a 5-minute ECG recording compared with standardized cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests for recognizing cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.
Does cardiac vagal tone derived from a 5-minute ECG recording accurately recognize asymptomatic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in adults with type 1 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Does cardiac vagal tone derived from a 5-minute ECG recording accurately recognize asymptomatic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in adults with type 1 diabetes?
p-value: p=0.01
Cardiac vagal tone derived from a 5-minute ECG may serve as a quick and accessible screening tool for recognizing asymptomatic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes.
CVT cut-offs show promise for CAN screening in T1D; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: To test the performance of the cardiac vagal tone (CVT) derived from a 5-minute ECG recording compared with the standardized cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs). METHODS: Cross-sectional study included 56 well-phenotyped adults with type 1 diabetes (19-71 years, 2-54 years disease-duration). Autonomic testing included: standardized CARTs obtained with the VAGUS™, CVT, and indices of heart rate variability (HRV) obtained at 24- and 120-hour, and electrochemical skin conductance assessed with SUDOSCAN®. ROC AUC and cut-off values were calculated for CVT to recognize CAN based on ≥ 2 (established CAN, n = 7) or 1 (borderline CAN, n = 9) abnormal CARTs and compared to HRV indices and electrochemical skin conductance. RESULTS: Established CAN: The cut-off CVT value of 3.2LVS showed 67% sensitivity and 87% specificity (p = 0.01). Indices of HRV at either 24-hour (AUC > 0.90) and 120-hour (AUC > 0.88) performed better than CVT. Borderline CAN: The cut-off CVT value of 5.2LVS indicated 88% sensitivity and 63% specificity (p = 0.07). CVT performed better than HRV indices (AUC < 0.72). Electrochemical skin conductance (AUC:0.63-0.72) had lower sensitivity and specificity compared with CVT. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of CVT with a clinically applicable cut-off value may be considered a quicker and accessible screening tool which could ultimately decrease the number of unrecognized CAN and initiate earlier prevention initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wegeberg et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in type 1 diabetes (n=56). Cardiac vagal tone (CVT) vs. standardized cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs) was evaluated on recognition of established cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (≥ 2 abnormal CARTs) (p=0.01). A cardiac vagal tone cut-off of 3.2LVS identified established cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy with 67% sensitivity and 87% specificity (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: