Reversal of the Sedative and Sympatholytic Effects of Dexmedetomidine with a Specific α2-Adrenoceptor Antagonist Atipamezole

BACKGROUND: Specific and selective alpha2-adrenergic drugs are widely exploited in veterinary anesthesiology. Because alpha2-agonists are also being introduced to human practice, the authors studied reversal of a clinically relevant dexmedetomidine dose with atipamezole, an alpha2-antagonist, in healthy persons. METHODS: The study consisted of two parts. In an open dose-finding study (part 1), the intravenous dose of atipamezole to reverse the sedative effects of 2.5 microg/kg of dexmedetomidine given intramuscularly was determined (n = 6). Part 2 was a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized cross-over study in which three doses of atipamezole (15, 50, and 150 microg/kg given intravenously in 2 min) or saline were administered 1 h after dexmedetomidine at 1-week intervals (n = 8). Subjective vigilance and anxiety, psychomotor performance, hemodynamics, and saliva secretion were determined, and plasma catecholamines and serum drug concentrations were measured for 7 h. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD atipamezole dose needed in part 1 was 104+/-44 microg/kg. In part 2, dexmedetomidine induced clear impairments of vigilance and psychomotor performance that were dose dependently reversed by atipamezole (P < 0.001). Complete resolution of sedation was evident after the highest (150 microg/kg) dose, and the degree of vigilance remained high for 7 h. Atipamezole dose dependently reversed the reductions in blood pressure (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P = 0.009). Changes in saliva secretion and plasma catecholamines were similarly biphasic (i.e., they decreased after dexmedetomidine followed by dose-dependent restoration after atipamezole). Plasma norepinephrine levels were, however, increased considerably after the 150 microg/kg dose of atipamezole. The pharmacokinetics of atipamezole were linear, and elimination half-lives for both drugs were approximately 2 h. Atipamezole did not affect the disposition of dexmedetomidine. One person had symptomatic sinus arrest, and another had transient bradycardia approximately 3 h after receiving dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: The sedative and sympatholytic effects of intramuscular dexmedetomidine were dose dependently antagonized by intravenous atipamezole. The applied infusion rate (75 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) for the highest atipamezole dose was, however, too fast, as evident by transient sympathoactivation. Similar elimination half-lives of these two drugs are a clear advantage considering the possible clinical applications.