In patients with bicuspid or unicuspid aortic valves and moderate/severe mixed aortic valve disease, the need for aortic valve replacement is high over 10 years and is strongly predicted by age and initial disease severity.
Patients with BAV and moderate/severe MAVD progress rapidly to AVR; supports closer surveillance for older patients or severe components but leaves optimal timing open pending prospective data.
OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of data about mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) in patients with bicuspid/unicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study sought to describe the outcomes of patients with moderate/severe MAVD. METHODS: We queried our database for patients with BAV and moderate/severe MAVD seen between 1994 and 2013. We excluded patients with baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) III/IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, aortic dimension >50 mm, and significant disease of other valves. The purpose of the study was to determine the freedom from NYHA III/IV symptoms and aortic valve replacement (AVR). RESULTS: We identified 138 patients with moderate/severe MAVD; mean age was 51 ± 12 years; 112 (81%) were males; and follow-up was 8.5 ± 4 years. Ninety-two patients (67%) underwent AVR within 3.7 ± 2.5 years. Mechanical prostheses were implanted in 73 patients (79%); 22 patients (26%) and 36 patients (39%) had concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and aorta replacement during AVR respectively. There were no surgical deaths. Freedom from AVR was 84%, 51%, and 20% at 1, 5 and 10 years respectively. Predictors of AVR were age at presentation (hazard ratio [HR] 5.22; confidence interval [CI] 3.10 to 6.64) for every decade increase in age; and having severe stenosis or regurgitation at the time of presentation (HR 1.32; CI 1.05 to 3.16). CONCLUSIONS: Age and disease severity should be incorporated in the risk assessment of BAV patients with MAVD, and patients with both risk factors should be monitored closely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egbe et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: