Why the study?
TEE is the standard imaging modality to assess the LAA after transcatheter device occlusion, but CCTA offers a non-invasive alternative requiring comparative evaluation.
Does CCTA compared to TEE improve the detection of LAA patency in patients post-transcatheter LAA occlusion?
Does CCTA compared to TEE improve the detection of LAA patency in patients post-transcatheter LAA occlusion?
CCTA is a viable non-invasive alternative to TEE for post-LAA occlusion assessment, demonstrating a higher likelihood of detecting LAA patency.
Background Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the standard imaging modality used to assess the left atrial appendage (LAA) after transcatheter device occlusion. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) offers an alternative non-invasive modality in these patients. We aimed to conduct a comparison of the two modalities. Methods We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature pertaining to CCTA to establish its usefulness during follow-up for patients undergoing LAA device closure. Studies that reported the prevalence of inadequate LAA closure on both CCTA and TEE were further evaluated in a meta-analysis. 19 studies were used in the systematic review, and six studies were used in the meta-analysis. Results The use of CCTA was associated with a higher likelihood of detecting LAA patency than the use of TEE (OR, 2.79, 95% CI 1.34–5.80, p = 0.006, I 2 = 70.4%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of peridevice gap ≥5 mm (OR, 3.04, 95% CI 0.70–13.17, p = 0.13, I 2 = 0%) between the two modalities. Studies that reported LAA assessment in early and delayed phase techniques detected a 25%–50% higher prevalence of LAA patency on the delayed imaging. Conclusion CCTA can be used as an alternative to TEE for LAA assessment post occlusion. Standardized CCTA acquisition and interpretation protocols should be developed for clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banga et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: