Why the study?
Does recombinant hirudin reduce thrombin generation and activity compared to heparin in patients with unstable angina?
Does recombinant hirudin reduce thrombin generation and activity compared to heparin in patients with unstable angina?
Intravenous recombinant hirudin transiently reduces in vivo thrombin generation compared to heparin in patients with unstable angina, but this biochemical benefit is not sustained at 1 month.
Transient hirudin-associated thrombin suppression in unstable angina does not persist; leaves open whether sustained anticoagulation alters long-term thrombin activity.
In patients with unstable angina, intravenous heparin reduces thrombin activity but does not influence thrombin generation. Recombinant hirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, may be more effective in inhibiting both thrombin generation and activity. We measured the plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (a marker of thrombin generation) and fibrinopeptide A (a marker of thrombin activity) in 67 patients with unstable angina enrolled in the GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) IIb trial who were receiving either recombinant hirudin (31 patients) or heparin (36 patients). Blood samples were obtained at baseline (before any treatment), after 3 to 5 days of study drug infusion (immediately before discontinuation), and 1 month later. In the patients receiving recombinant hirudin, the prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels measured immediately before drug discontinuation were significantly lower than at baseline (P:=0.0014), whereas they had not changed in the patients receiving heparin; at this time point, the difference between patients receiving hirudin and those receiving heparin was statistically significant (P:=0.032). One month later, the prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels in both groups were similarly persistently high and did not differ from baseline. Fibrinopeptide A plasma levels at the end of infusion were significantly lower than at baseline in both treatment groups (P:=0. 0005 for hirudin and P:=0.042 for heparin) and remained lower after 1 month (P:=0.0001 for both hirudin and heparin). The fibrinopeptide A plasma levels were not different between patients treated with hirudin versus heparin at baseline, at the end of infusion, and after 1 month. Thus, in patients with unstable angina, in vivo thrombin generation and activity are reduced during intravenous infusion of recombinant hirudin. However, the inhibition of thrombin generation is not sustained, and after 1 month, the majority of patients have biochemical signs of increased thrombin generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merlini et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: