Why the study?
Does a framework blending Lean Sigma, design thinking, and Lean Startup reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions in heart failure patients?
Does a framework blending Lean Sigma, design thinking, and Lean Startup reduce 30-day all-cause readmissions in heart failure patients?
Applying methodologies from technology and manufacturing companies, such as Lean Sigma and design thinking, significantly reduces 30-day readmissions in heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support blended quality frameworks for HF readmission reduction; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm effect.
Heart failure (HF) patients have high 30-day readmission rates with high costs and poor quality of life. This study investigated the impact of a framework blending Lean Sigma, design thinking, and Lean Startup on 30-day all-cause readmissions among HF patients. This was a prospective study in an academic hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. Thirty-day all-cause readmission was assessed using the hospital's electronic medical record. The baseline readmission rate for HF was 28.4% in 2010 with 690 discharges. The framework was developed and interventions implemented in the second half of 2011. The impact of the interventions was evaluated through 2012. The rate declined to 18.9% among 703 discharges (P < .01). There was no significant change for non-HF readmissions. This study concluded that methodologies from technology and manufacturing companies can reduce 30-day readmissions in HF, demonstrating the potential of this innovations framework to improve chronic disease care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: