Key result
Ensemble and hybrid AI models boost cardiac disease prediction accuracy to ~99% vs traditional ML.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death globally, creating a critical need for proper, effective, and interpretive diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence.
Systematic Review
Advanced ensemble and hybrid machine learning models achieve high accuracy (up to 99%) for cardiac disease prediction, though challenges remain regarding interpretability and class imbalance.
Varying ML/DL success in CVD prediction warrants standardized validation; leaves open optimal clinical deployment.
The cardiovascular (Cardiac) disease (CVD) is another factor that causes death among the global population most, and this is the reason why there is a high necessity to implement proper, effective, and interpretive diagnostic systems. The usage of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and hybrid algorithms of artificial intelligence to predict heart diseases has enjoyed a widespread use in the recent years with different levels of success. The current paper provides a systematized review of the latest ML-, DL-, and hybrid-based systems to predict heart disease that include ensemble model, deep learning model, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and privacy-preserving model. The analyzed studies are evaluated based on datasets, classifiers, validation methods, data balancing and evaluation measures methods. It is illustrated in the analysis that the traditional ML models are most likely to have the prediction accuracy in between 80-90, the ensemble and hybrid models will most likely have the prediction accuracy in between 90-98. Recent explainable and fine-tuned ensemble methods show an accuracy of a level of 99, however, frequently under controlled conditions. Irrespective of the developments made, the issues include low interpretability, excessive benchmark data, imbalance in classes, and computational complexity. According to the research gaps that are mentioned, the given review reflects the necessity of clarifiable hybrid models that include high performing ensemble models like XGBoost and Deep learning-based feature fusion to increase the predictive quality, transparency and clinical usability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budihal et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac disease. Machine learning, deep learning, and explainable AI approaches vs. Traditional machine learning models was evaluated on Prediction accuracy. Ensemble, hybrid, and explainable AI models achieved prediction accuracies of 90-99% for cardiac disease, compared to 80-90% for traditional machine learning models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: