Exploratory study reveals links between EEG measures and accuracy changes in youth soccer players, suggesting neural correlates under pressure.
Choking under evaluative pressure is often described in sport, yet its within-session neural and behavioural correlates in youth athletes remain poorly characterised. In this exploratory, fixed-order study we asked whether changes in soccer decision accuracy over the course of a single session covaried with EEG and eye-tracking measures. Thirteen male youth soccer players completed an image-based decision-making task across three condition-labelled blocks presented in a fixed sequence: a neutral-labelled baseline (b1), an outcome-labelled block (b2), and a monitoring-labelled block (b3), while EEG from 19 scalp electrodes referenced online to A2 and mobile eye tracking were recorded. At the block-summary level, accuracy showed an omnibus effect (Friedman χ²(2) = 12.12, p = 0.002, Kendall’s W = 0.47) and was lowest in b3, but no pairwise contrast survived maxT correction, and a trial-level generalised linear mixed-effects model with crossed random intercepts for participant and scene revealed no reliable block effect (b3 vs. b1 OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.73, 1.17], p = 0.501; omnibus block LRT χ²(2) = 0.45, p = 0.800). Response time did not vary reliably across blocks. Instead, the clearest signal emerged between individuals: the size of each player’s b1-to-b3 accuracy change tracked the change in frontal spectral entropy, computed over a filter-compatible 1–35 Hz band (Spearman ρ = −0.70, 95% bootstrap CI [− 0.91, − 0.23], permutation p = 0.010, n = 13). This association held across a broad set of sensitivity analyses, including a 1–40 Hz entropy band, exclusion of Fp1 and Fp2, a 30–35 Hz muscle-proxy control, aperiodic exponent and offset controls, and outlier and winsorisation checks, although it weakened once retained clean EEG duration was taken into account. Central alpha-range relative power showed a weaker and spatially non-specific secondary association, and we do not interpret it as a sensorimotor mechanism. Eye-tracking measures changed little across blocks and were unrelated to accuracy change. CSAI-2R self-report scores indicated higher cognitive anxiety in the outcome-labelled and monitoring-labelled blocks than in the neutral block, but condition remained fully confounded with block order. We therefore frame frontal spectral entropy as a candidate individual-difference correlate of within-session accuracy change rather than as evidence of pressure-specific causation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rezaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: