This contribution critiques ecological policies affecting the Po River, suggesting a paradigm shift in recognizing water's rights.
Drawing from the hydrofeminist perspective proposed by Astrida Neimanis this contribution assumes the Po River as the subject of its practice of care and calls for a recognition of its ecological rights as body of water. To do so, the reflection questions the persistence of policies that reduce water to a mere resource – measurable, scalable, thus controllable and productive – thereby translating ecological risk into a renewed form of capital expansion. The great renaturation plan of the Po River will be the paradigmatic case and object of this critique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davide Montanari (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: