Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve acute ischemic mitral regurgitation in a patient with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve acute ischemic mitral regurgitation in a patient with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock?
Transesophageal echocardiography in the catheterization laboratory can accurately diagnose the mechanism of acute severe mitral regurgitation, allowing for successful treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation with percutaneous coronary intervention.
Intraprocedural TEE clarifies ischemic MR mechanism in acute MI shock; leaves open whether it changes management or outcomes.
An 80-year-old woman with acute posterolateralmyocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and acute heart failure was admitted to our hospital. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed dysfunction of the left ventricular inferolateral wall motion and severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Emergency coronary angiography revealed triple-vessel stenosis. We performed transesophageal echocardiography in the catheter room to diagnose the cause of MR. Severe tenting of the mitral valve and no rupture of the papillary muscles were revealed. We considered ischemic MR likely to improve with revascularization and performed percutaneous coronary intervention. Subsequently, the patient's circulatory dynamics rapidly stabilized, and MR was significantly improved on follow-up TTE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: