Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin with fewer bleeding complications.
Why the study?
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and VTE risk with fewer bleeding complications compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation or acute deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism?
Do direct oral anticoagulants reduce stroke and VTE risk with fewer bleeding complications compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation or acute deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism?
Direct oral anticoagulants offer an effective alternative to warfarin for stroke and VTE prevention, with the advantage of fewer bleeding complications and no need for routine monitoring.
Over the past 6 decades, warfarin has proven efficacious in reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. However, there have been multiple challenges with using warfarin including delayed onset of action, need for bridging and monitoring as well as many drug-drug and drug-food interactions. Hence, long years of research have led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants. Of the 4 direct oral anticoagulants currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, 1 is a direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and the other 3 are direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban). Direct oral anticoagulants have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin with fewer bleeding complications. This paper provides an overview of the evolution of anticoagulation therapies and an extensive literature review of the new direct oral anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skeik et al. (2017) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation, acute deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) vs. Warfarin was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin with fewer bleeding complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: