Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: serious emotional and behavioral problems in children/adolescents can be identified by informants through screening instruments, which can increase their chances of receiving care in mental health services. Objectives: verify and compare serious emotional and behavioral problems in elementary school students depending on school type and correlate these problems with the use of mental health services. Method: observational cross-sectional study with a convenience sample composed of 357 children and adolescents between 6 and 12 years old without mental health complaints, from public and private schools. Instruments: Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18) and questionnaire for use of mental health services. To identify serious emotional and behavioral problems, critical items from the behavioral problem syndrome scales and scales guided by the CBCL/6-18 DSM were used. Results: different types of serious emotional and behavioral problems were identified using critical items, such as physically attacking other people (16.5%), saying they are going to kill themselves (5.6%), seeing things that don't exist (3, 9%), setting things on fire (7.9%) and hearing sounds or voices that don't exist (2.8%). Bivariate analysis showed that, despite the frequency of these serious emotional and behavioral problems, the use of mental health services was extremely low (0.84%). Conclusion: the critical items of the CBCL/6-18 help to screen for serious emotional and behavioral difficulties that can negatively impact the mental health of children/adolescents. The lack of parental recognition of serious mental health problems still demands theoretical and empirical deepening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teixeira et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: