Key result
A tailored, blended curriculum significantly improved nurses' perception of the relevance of information during handovers (mean score 61.03 vs 53.19; p=0.04).
Why the study?
Inadequate nursing handovers negatively impact patient safety, but evidence regarding strategies to improve nursing handover is lacking.
Does a tailored, blended curriculum improve nurses' perception of handover quality?
Does a tailored, blended curriculum improve nurses' perception of handover quality?
Absolute Event Rate: 61.03% vs 53.19%
p-value: p=0.04
A blended curriculum combining e-learning and face-to-face sessions significantly improved nurses' perception of the relevance and timely provision of information during handovers.
Blended training may improve nurses' handover perceptions in select units; leaves open effects on actual practices or outcomes.
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The negative consequences of inadequate nursing handovers on patient safety are widely acknowledged, both within the literature as in practice. Evidence regarding strategies to improve nursing handover is, however, lacking. This study investigates the effect of a tailored, blended curriculum on nurses' perception of handover quality. METHODS: We used a pre-test/post-test design within four units of a Belgian general hospital. Our educational intervention consisted of an e-learning module on professional communication and a face-to-face session on the use of a structured method for handovers. All nurses completed this blended curriculum (n=87). We used the Handover Evaluation Scale (HES) to evaluate nurses' perception of handover quality before and after the intervention. The HES was answered by 87.4% of the nurses (n=76 of 87) before and 50.6% (n=44 of 87) after the intervention. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the validity of the HES. RESULTS: The original factor structure did not fit with our data. We identified a new HES structure with acceptable or good fit indices. The overall internal consistency of our HES structure was considered adequate. Perception of nurses on Relevance of information showed a significant improvement (M=53.19±4.33 vs M=61.03±6.01; p=0.04). Nurses also felt that the timely provision of patient information improved significantly (M=4.50±0.34 vs M=5.16±0.40; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The applied intervention resulted in an improved awareness on the importance of Relevance of information during handovers. After our intervention, the nurses' perception of the HES item 'Patient information is provided in a timely manner' also improved significantly. We are aware that the educational intervention is only the first step to achieve the long-term implementation of a culture of professional communication based on mutual support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Losfeld et al. (2021) studied Inadequate nursing handovers (n=87). Tailored, blended curriculum (e-learning and face-to-face session) vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Perception of nurses on Relevance of information (p=0.04). A tailored, blended curriculum significantly improved nurses' perception of the relevance of information during handovers (mean score 61.03 vs 53.19; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: