This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OCTOBER 135, Winter 2011, pp. 21–48. © 2011 October Magazine, Ltd. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. As Caroline Jones has demonstrated, midcentury aesthetics was dominated by a rhetoric of isolated and purified opticality.2 But another aesthetics, one dramatically opposed to it, was in motion at the time. Operating at a subterranean level, it began, as early as 1951, to articulate a vision of intermedia assemblage. Rather than cohering into the synaesthetic unity of the Wagnerian Gesamtkunstwerk, works in this vein sought to juxtapose multiple registers of sensory experience—the spatial and the temporal, the textual and the imagistic—into pieces that were intentionally disjunctive and lacking in unity. Within them, we can already observe questions that would come to haunt the topos of avant-garde film and performance in the coming decades: questions regarding the nature and specificity of cinema, its place within artistic modernism and mass culture, the institutions through which it is presented, and the possible modes of its spectatorial engagement. Crucially associated with
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew V. Uroskie (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: