Key result
Apolipoprotein B and NMR-derived LDL particle number were comparable in assessing cardiovascular risk, with both showing statistically significant associations in 58.8% of 85 clinical comparisons.
Why the study?
Are apolipoprotein B and NMR-derived LDL particle number comparable in their association with cardiovascular disease outcomes?
Are apolipoprotein B and NMR-derived LDL particle number comparable in their association with cardiovascular disease outcomes?
Apo B and LDL-P are comparable and strong indicators of CVD risk, with apo B recommended as the preferable biomarker for guideline adoption due to its availability, scalability, standardization, and lower cost.
ApoB and LDL-P show comparable CVD risk associations; leaves open whether apoB's advantages warrant guideline preference pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: The number of circulating LDL particles is a strong indicator of future cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, even superior to the concentration of LDL cholesterol. Atherogenic (primarily LDL) particle number is typically determined either directly by the serum concentration of apolipoprotein B (apo B) or indirectly by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of serum to obtain NMR-derived LDL particle number (LDL-P). CONTENT: To assess the comparability of apo B and LDL-P, we reviewed 25 clinical studies containing 85 outcomes for which both biomarkers were determined. In 21 of 25 (84.0%) studies, both apo B and LDL-P were significant for at least 1 outcome. Neither was significant for any outcome in only 1 study (4.0%). In 50 of 85 comparisons (58.8%), both apo B and LDL-P had statistically significant associations with the clinical outcome, whereas in 17 comparisons (20.0%) neither was significantly associated with the outcome. In 18 comparisons (21.1%) there was discordance between apo B and LDL-P. CONCLUSIONS: In most studies, both apo B and LDL-P were comparable in association with clinical outcomes. The biomarkers were nearly equivalent in their ability to assess risk for CVD and both have consistently been shown to be stronger risk factors than LDL-C. We support the adoption of apo B and/or LDL-P as indicators of atherogenic particle numbers into CVD risk screening and treatment guidelines. Currently, in the opinion of this Working Group on Best Practices, apo B appears to be the preferable biomarker for guideline adoption because of its availability, scalability, standardization, and relatively low cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cole et al. (2013) conducted a review in cardiovascular disease. Apolipoprotein B and NMR-derived LDL particle number was evaluated on Association with clinical outcomes. Apolipoprotein B and NMR-derived LDL particle number were comparable in assessing cardiovascular risk, with both showing statistically significant associations in 58.8% of 85 clinical comparisons.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: