Key result
This review summarizes available technologies for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and published trials on their safety and efficacy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous LAA closure prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does percutaneous LAA closure prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Percutaneous LAA closure is an increasingly utilized alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, with at least one device demonstrating noninferiority to warfarin.
Summarizes LAA closure technologies and trials; leaves open optimal device selection and long-term efficacy in nonvalvular AF.
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, confers a 5-fold risk of stroke that increases to 17-fold when associated with mitral stenosis. At this time, the most effective long-term solution to protect patients from stroke and thromboembolism is oral anticoagulation, either with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC). Despite the significant benefits they confer, both VKAs and NOACs are underused because of their increased potential for bleeding, and VKAs are underused because of their narrow therapeutic range, need for regular international normalized ratio checks, and interactions with food or medications. In patients with nonvalvular AF, approximately 90% of strokes originate from the left atrial appendage (LAA); in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, many patients (60%) have strokes that originate from the left atrium itself. Surgical LAA amputation or closure, although widely used to reduce stroke risk in association with cardiac surgery, is not currently performed as a stand-alone operation for stroke risk reduction because of its invasiveness. Percutaneous LAA closure, as an alternative to anticoagulation, has been increasingly used during the last decade in an effort to reduce stroke risk in nonvalvular AF. Several devices have been introduced during this time, of which one has demonstrated noninferiority compared with warfarin in a randomized controlled trial. This review describes the available technologies for percutaneous LAA closure, as well as a summary of the published trials concerning their safety and efficacy in reducing stroke risk in AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Essebag et al. (2015) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure vs. Anticoagulation was evaluated on Stroke risk. This review summarizes available technologies for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure and published trials on their safety and efficacy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: