Key result
Percutaneous coronary revascularisation outcomes and quality of life were prospectively evaluated in 74 octogenarians at 6 and 12 months, though the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary revascularisation improve quality of life and clinical outcomes in octogenarians?
Cohort (n=74)
Does percutaneous coronary revascularisation improve quality of life and clinical outcomes in octogenarians?
This prospective cohort study aimed to assess quality of life and clinical outcomes in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation at 6 and 12 months.
Prospective cohort yields no quantitative PCI results in octogenarians; leaves open effects on quality of life and outcomes.
SIR—Population demographics in industrialised nations predict an increase in octogenarian patients. Poor outcomes following coronary intervention have led researchers to question the role of such procedures in this population [1]. Elderly patients undergoing revascularisation are more likely to present with complex lesions and associated co-morbid conditions [2]. Although the effects of cardiovascular therapies on morbidity and mortality have been reported [3–5], there is paucity of data on quality of life following percutaneous coronary revascularisation (PCR) in octogenarians. We recorded both clinical outcomes and quality of life in octogenarians at 6 and 12 months after PCR. Seventy-four consecutive patients aged ≥80 years undergoing PCR were recruited over 18 months and prospectively studied. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. No patients underwent more than two-vessel revascularisation, 28 patients underwent two-vessel revascularisation and the remainder underwent single vessel only. We obtained data for the eight scales and the physical and mental health summary scales [6, 7]. The summary scales were compared to normative data for the general population, age >75 years in the USA [7, 8]. The data from the eight individual scales were compared to the normative data from the UK population [9].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring revascularisation (n=74). Percutaneous coronary revascularisation vs. Normative data for the general population was evaluated on Clinical outcomes and quality of life. Percutaneous coronary revascularisation outcomes and quality of life were prospectively evaluated in 74 octogenarians at 6 and 12 months, though the abstract reports no quantitative results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: