Key result
Urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD polymer stent coatings showed no statistical difference in stenosis and inflammation compared to bare metal controls at 28 and 90 days in a porcine model.
Why the study?
Do novel biodegradable polymer coatings (urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD) with or without sirolimus demonstrate vascular biocompatibility compared to bare metal stents in a porcine coronary artery model?
Do novel biodegradable polymer coatings (urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD) with or without sirolimus demonstrate vascular biocompatibility compared to bare metal stents in a porcine coronary artery model?
SynBiosys urethane-linked MBCP and Eureka SOLO hydrophobic MD polymers demonstrate good vascular biocompatibility and appropriate degradation profiles in a porcine model, supporting their potential use in next-generation drug-eluting stents.
These coatings showed biocompatibility akin to bare metal in pigs; leaves open suitability for human drug-eluting stents.
We have used a series of in vitro and in vivo tests to assess the suitability of two new degradable polymers for application as coatings for drug-eluting stents. The first is a family of urethane-linked multi-block copolymers (MBCP) that comprise blocks of lactide, glycolide, epsilon-caprolactone and/or poly(ethylene glycol) chain-extended with 1,4-butanediisocyanate (SynBiosys polymers). The second is a family of maltodextrin (MD) modified with fatty acid sidechains to yield a hydrophobic polymer (Eureka() SOLO polymers). We coated stainless-steel stents with two representative urethane-linked MBCPs and one hydrophobic MD polymer alone or in combination with the anti-restenotic drug sirolimus. Urethane-linked MBCPs formed uniform coatings on the stent substrates, withstood crimping and expansion on balloon catheters, completely released sirolimus from the coating within 30 days, and degraded within 30-60 days in PBS. The hydrophobic MD polymer formed uniform coatings, exhibited somewhat slower release of sirolimus (approx. 85% within 30 days), degraded within 60 days in PBS when sirolimus was incorporated in the coating, but showed very slow degradation in the absence of drug. We implanted stents coated with urethane-linked MBCPs or hydrophobic MD polymers in a porcine coronary artery model and used histological analysis at 28- and 90-day end-points to assess the biological response to the materials. Measures of stenosis and inflammation for urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD polymer coatings were not statistically different from bare metal controls at 28 and 90 days, suggesting that the polymers show good vascular biocompatibility. Endothelialization was nearly complete at 28 days and complete at 90 days for all formulations. Urethane-linked MBCP polymer-only and drug-eluting coatings and hydrophobic MD drug-eluting coatings were nearly completely degraded within 90 days in vivo whereas roughly half of hydrophobic MD polymer-only coatings remained after 90 days. Taken together, our in vitro and in vivo results suggest that SynBiosys urethane-linked MBCP and Eureka SOLO hydrophobic MD polymer families possess the physical and chemical properties and vascular biocompatibility necessary for further investigation for use in the next generation of drug-eluting stents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lockwood et al. (2010) studied this question. Urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD polymer stent coatings vs. Bare metal controls was evaluated on Measures of stenosis and inflammation. Urethane-linked MBCP and hydrophobic MD polymer stent coatings showed no statistical difference in stenosis and inflammation compared to bare metal controls at 28 and 90 days in a porcine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: