Key result
In opioid maintenance treatment, 4.6% of methadone patients had QTc intervals >500 ms compared to 0% on buprenorphine, with a maximum attributable mortality of 0.06 per 100 patient-years.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of QTc prolongation and associated mortality in patients receiving methadone or buprenorphine for opioid maintenance treatment?
Observational (n=2,382)
Single-blind
Yes
What is the prevalence of QTc prolongation and associated mortality in patients receiving methadone or buprenorphine for opioid maintenance treatment?
Methadone treatment is associated with dose-dependent QTc prolongation, but the maximum mortality attributable to this effect is very low.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methadone QTc prolongation confers negligible mortality risk in maintenance therapy; leaves open whether routine ECG monitoring improves safety.
AIMS: To determine the prevalence of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation among patients in opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) and to investigate mortality potentially attributable to QTc prolongation in the Norwegian OMT programme. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Two hundred OMT patients in Oslo were recruited to the QTc assessment study between October 2006 and August 2007. The Norwegian register of all patients receiving OMT in Norway (January 1997-December 2003) and the national death certificate register were used to assess mortality. Mortality records were examined for the 90 deaths that had occurred among 2382 patients with 6450 total years in OMT. DESIGN AND MEASURES: The QTc interval was assessed by electrocardiography (ECG). All ECGs were examined by the same cardiologist, who was blind to patient history and medication. Mortality was calculated by cross-matching the OMT register and the national death certificate register: deaths that were possibly attributable to QTc prolongation were divided by the number of patient-years in OMT. FINDINGS: In the QTc assessment sample (n = 200), 173 patients (86.5%) received methadone and 27 (13.5%) received buprenorphine. In the methadone group, 4.6% (n = 8) had a QTc above 500 milliseconds; 15% (n = 26) had a QTc interval above 470 milliseconds; and 28.9% (n = 50) had a QTc above 450 milliseconds. All patients receiving buprenorphine (n = 27) had QTc results <450 milliseconds. A positive dose-dependent association was identified between QTc length and dose of methadone, and all patients with a QTc above 500 milliseconds were taking methadone doses of 120 mg or more. OMT patient mortality, where QTc prolongation could not be excluded as the cause of death, was 0.06/100 patient-years. Only one death among 3850 OMT initiations occurred within the first month of treatment. CONCLUSION: Of the methadone patients, 4.6% had QTc intervals above 500 milliseconds. The maximum mortality attributable to QTc prolongation was low: 0.06 per 100 patient-years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anchersen et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Opioid dependence (n=2,382). Methadone vs. Buprenorphine was evaluated on QTc interval > 500 milliseconds. In opioid maintenance treatment, 4.6% of methadone patients had QTc intervals >500 ms compared to 0% on buprenorphine, with a maximum attributable mortality of 0.06 per 100 patient-years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: