Key result
A soft-voting ensemble classifier outperformed other machine learning models in predicting acute coronary syndrome outcomes, achieving an accuracy of 99.07% and an AUC of 99.97%.
Why the study?
Machine learning offers potential in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases, motivating the development of a soft-voting ensemble classifier to predict in-hospital ACS outcomes and mortality.
Does a machine learning-based soft-voting ensemble classifier improve the prediction of ACS outcomes and mortality during hospital stay compared to base classifiers?
Does a machine learning-based soft-voting ensemble classifier improve the prediction of ACS outcomes and mortality during hospital stay compared to base classifiers?
A machine learning-based soft-voting ensemble classifier demonstrated exceptionally high accuracy and AUC for predicting ACS outcomes and in-hospital mortality.
May aid ACS risk stratification; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Nowadays, machine learning (ML) is a revolutionary and cutting-edge technology widely used in the medical domain and health informatics in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases especially. Therefore, we propose a ML-based soft-voting ensemble classifier (SVEC) for the predictive modeling of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) outcomes such as STEMI and NSTEMI, discharge reasons for the patients admitted in the hospitals, and death types for the affected patients during the hospital stay. We used the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR-NIH) dataset, which has 13,104 patients' data containing 551 features. After data extraction and preprocessing, we used the 125 useful features and applied the SMOTETomek hybrid sampling technique to oversample the data imbalance of minority classes. Our proposed SVEC applied three ML algorithms, such as random forest, extra tree, and the gradient-boosting machine for predictive modeling of our target variables, and compared with the performances of all base classifiers. The experiments showed that the SVEC outperformed other ML-based predictive models in accuracy (99.0733%), precision (99.0742%), recall (99.0734%), F1-score (99.9719%), and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) (99.9702%). Overall, the performance of the SVEC was better than other applied models, but the AUC was slightly lower than the extra tree classifier for the predictive modeling of ACS outcomes. The proposed predictive model outperformed other ML-based models; hence it can be used practically in hospitals for the diagnosis and prediction of heart problems so that timely detection of proper treatments can be chosen, and the occurrence of disease predicted more accurately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sherazi et al. (2023) studied Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=13,104). Soft-voting ensemble classifier (SVEC) vs. Base classifiers (random forest, extra tree, gradient-boosting machine) was evaluated on Accuracy of predicting ACS outcomes, discharge reasons, and death types. A soft-voting ensemble classifier outperformed other machine learning models in predicting acute coronary syndrome outcomes, achieving an accuracy of 99.07% and an AUC of 99.97%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: