Key result
The age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff achieved the best diagnostic performance for asymptomatic VTE in bedridden hospitalized patients aged 65-80 years compared to conventional and ROC-derived cutoffs.
Why the study?
Does an age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff improve diagnostic performance for asymptomatic VTE in bedridden hospitalized elderly patients compared to conventional cutoffs?
Observational (n=252)
No
Does an age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff improve diagnostic performance for asymptomatic VTE in bedridden hospitalized elderly patients compared to conventional cutoffs?
Age-adjusted d-dimer cutoffs improve the diagnostic performance for excluding asymptomatic VTE in hospitalized bedridden patients aged 65-80 years.
May aid VTE screening in elderly inpatients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
A rapid and accurate diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the elderly individuals represents a dilemma due to nonspecific clinical presentation, confusing laboratory results, and the hazards of radiological examination in this age-group. d-Dimer test is used mainly in combination with non-high clinical pretest probability (PTP) to exclude VTE. d-Dimer testing retains its sensitivity, however, its specificity decreases in the elderly individuals. Raising the cutoff level improves the specificity of the d-dimer test without compromising its sensitivity. The current study aimed to explore the reliability of higher d-dimer cutoff values for the diagnosis of asymptomatic VTE in a population of bedridden hospitalized elderly patients with non-high clinical PTP. This retrospective study included 252 bedridden hospitalized elderly patients (>65 years) who were admitted to the Ain shams University Specialized Hospital with non-high clinical probability and developed later reduced mobility; all underwent quantitation of d-dimer and Doppler examination. Considering the whole population (>65 years), the age-adjusted cutoff achieved the best performance in comparison with the conventional and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-derived cutoffs. When stratified according to age, the age-adjusted cutoff showed the best performance in the age-group 65-70 and comparable performance with the ROC-derived cutoff in the age-group 71-80, however, its sensitivity compromised in those older than 80 years. In conclusion, it is recommended to use age-adjusted cutoff value of d-dimer together with the clinical probability score in elderly individuals (65-80 years).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassim et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n=252). Age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff vs. Conventional and ROC-derived cutoffs was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for asymptomatic VTE. The age-adjusted d-dimer cutoff achieved the best diagnostic performance for asymptomatic VTE in bedridden hospitalized patients aged 65-80 years compared to conventional and ROC-derived cutoffs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: