Key result
Care pathway implementation significantly improved intervals from first medical contact to PCI and door to PCI, as well as composite outcomes for in-hospital STEMI care.
Why the study?
Does a collaborative care pathway improve timely coronary reperfusion and optimal secondary prevention in adult STEMI patients?
Observational
Yes
Does a collaborative care pathway improve timely coronary reperfusion and optimal secondary prevention in adult STEMI patients?
Implementation of a collaborative care pathway significantly improves in-hospital STEMI care metrics, including FMC-to-PCI and door-to-PCI times.
Care pathway implementation was associated with improved composite STEMI metrics; leaves open causal benefits and need for prospective confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: To study the care pathway effect on the percentage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction -(STEMI) receiving timely coronary reperfusion and the percentage of STEMI patients receiving optimal secondary prevention. METHODS: A care pathway was implemented by the Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. One pre-intervention and 2 post-intervention audits included all adult STEMI patients admitted within 24 h after onset and eligible for reperfusion. Adjusted (hospital random intercepts and controls for transfer and out-of-office admission) differences in composite outcomes were analyzed by a multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Significant improvements in intervals between the first medical contact (FMC) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and between the door to PCI were shown between post-intervention audit II and post-intervention audit I. Secondary prevention significantly deteriorated at post-intervention audit I but improved significantly between both post-intervention audits. Six out of nine outcomes were significantly poorer in the case of transfer. The interval from FMC to PCI was significantly poorer for patients admitted during out-of-office hours. CONCLUSIONS: After care pathway implementation, composite outcomes improved for in-hospital STEMI care. Collaborative efforts exploited heterogeneity in performance between hospitals. Iterative and incremental care pathway implementation maximized performance improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aeyels et al. (2018) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Care pathway implementation vs. Pre-intervention care was evaluated on Percentage of patients receiving timely coronary reperfusion and optimal secondary prevention. Care pathway implementation significantly improved intervals from first medical contact to PCI and door to PCI, as well as composite outcomes for in-hospital STEMI care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: